Memuatkan...
Memuatkan...
It looks like an arrangement where everybody wins. The buyer gets a car without applying for financing; the seller sheds an instalment they can no longer afford. What has not happened is a transfer. The car still belongs to the financier through the original hirer, and it stays that way until the agreement is settled.
Both sides are exposed, in opposite directions: the person paying has no ownership and no standing with the bank, and the person named keeps every liability. This page sets out both, and the route that actually works.
Prefer Bahasa Malaysia? Sambung Bayar Kereta: Kenapa Sangat Berisiko
Someone hands over a car that is still under a hire-purchase agreement, and the other person agrees to keep making the monthly payments — with no application to change the hirer and no ownership transfer at JPJ. There is often a private written agreement between the two, sometimes witnessed. Neither the financier nor JPJ recognises it.
Legally, the vehicle remains bound by the original agreement under the Hire Purchase Act 1967. The registered owner at JPJ and the hirer named at the bank are the same people they were before — no matter whose money arrives each month.
The appeal is real and worth stating plainly, because pretending otherwise makes the rest of the page easy to dismiss. A buyer who would not pass a financing assessment gets a car. A seller under pressure gets out from under an instalment without finding a lump sum to settle the balance. Nobody has to talk to a bank. It can be arranged in an afternoon.
The problem is that none of that changes who owns the car or who owes the money — and both of those facts reassert themselves at exactly the moment something goes wrong.
Handing over the keys does not hand over the obligation. The person named in the agreement remains the borrower for its full term.
A written agreement between the two parties — even a witnessed one — does not bind the financier, does not change the hirer, and does not change the registered owner. It is a contract between two people about an asset that belongs to neither of them.
If a dispute arises — the payer refuses to return the car, or the seller refuses to return money already paid — the remedy is a private civil claim: slow, costly, and uncertain for both sides. That is a different universe from a JPJ transfer recognised by the financier, which simply ends the question.
Most people reading this are not deciding whether to start — they are already several months in. The position is recoverable, and the first two steps are the same for both sides.
The more useful framing is that it is ineffective rather than criminal. Handing over a car and taking over the payments does not transfer ownership, does not change the hirer named in the hire-purchase agreement, and does not change the registered owner at JPJ. It also typically breaches the agreement itself, which normally prohibits parting with possession without the owner’s consent — giving the financier a contractual ground to act quite apart from any arrears.
No. Nothing about paying makes you the hirer or the registered owner. At the end of the agreement the vehicle belongs to the person named in it, not to whoever funded the instalments. You cannot sell it, you cannot use it as security, and you have no claim on it — only a private claim against the other person, enforceable in the civil courts.
Yes, because the bank’s relationship is with the registered hirer, not with you. If that person falls into arrears on this or another matter, the statutory process runs against them. Under section 16(1) of the Hire Purchase Act 1967 the financier needs two successive defaults and a Fourth Schedule notice with a period of not less than 21 days — and every one of those notices goes to the hirer’s name and address, not yours. You can be paying on time and learn about it only when the car is gone.
Arrears are recorded against the name in the contract — yours. If the person paying stops, or pays late, or disappears, it is your record that carries it, and it can affect a home loan, another car loan or a credit card application years later. That exposure does not end when you hand over the keys; it ends when the agreement ends.
It applies, but it protects the hirer rather than the payer. Where instalments paid amount to more than seventy-five per cent of the total cash price, section 16(1A) requires the financier to obtain a court order before taking possession, and section 16(1C) raises the threshold to four successive defaults where the hirer has died. Those protections attach to the person named in the agreement. If you are the one paying but not the one named, the protection is not yours to invoke.
Yes, and it is not complicated: settle the existing agreement, then transfer ownership at JPJ. In practice that means obtaining a settlement figure from the financier, paying it — either in cash or with new financing taken in the buyer’s own name — and completing the ownership transfer once the financier releases its interest. The seller is then genuinely free of the liability, and the buyer genuinely owns the car.
Establish two facts first: the current settlement figure from the financier, and what the car is actually worth. If the car is worth more than the settlement, a formal sale can usually be arranged and both sides come out cleanly. If it is worth less, someone has to fund the difference, and that conversation is better had now than after a repossession — when the shortfall still exists but the car does not.
General educational guidance, not legal advice. Hire-purchase terms, insurance policy conditions and financier procedures vary. Confirm your own agreement, your insurer's position on authorised drivers, and any settlement figure directly with the parties concerned.